# AEM Editable Template and Content Policy Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Authoring Rules That Quietly Rebuild Complexity

Dec 3, 2024

By Oleksiy Kalinichenko

AEM to Drupal migrations often focus on content models, component inventories, and page rendering, while the authoring rules inside editable templates and content policies stay underexamined until late delivery. That is risky.

Those rules frequently control which components can appear where, how layouts behave, what authors are allowed to change, and which assumptions have become embedded in day-to-day publishing. This article explains how to audit those constraints before Drupal target-state decisions harden, so teams can preserve necessary governance without carrying forward accidental complexity.

Need help applying this?

Talk through the article with an expert and turn the guidance into a practical next step.

Talk to an expert

Summarize this page with AI

[](https://chat.openai.com/?q=Summarize%20this%20page%20for%20me%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pathtoproject.com%2Fblog%2F20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration "Summarize this page with ChatGPT")[](https://claude.ai/new?q=Summarize%20this%20page%20for%20me%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pathtoproject.com%2Fblog%2F20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration "Summarize this page with Claude")[](https://www.google.com/search?udm=50&q=Summarize%20this%20page%20for%20me%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pathtoproject.com%2Fblog%2F20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration "Summarize this page with Gemini")[](https://x.com/i/grok?text=Summarize%20this%20page%20for%20me%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pathtoproject.com%2Fblog%2F20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration "Summarize this page with Grok")[](https://www.perplexity.ai/search/new?q=Summarize%20this%20page%20for%20me%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pathtoproject.com%2Fblog%2F20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration "Summarize this page with Perplexity")

![Blog: AEM Editable Template and Content Policy Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Authoring Rules That Quietly Rebuild Complexity](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/w_764,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/blog-20241203-aem-editable-template-and-content-policy-audit-before-drupal-migration--cover)

AEM to Drupal migration planning usually starts with a familiar set of questions: what content exists, which components are in use, how pages are assembled, and what the target architecture should look like. Those are necessary questions, but they are not sufficient.

A less visible layer often shapes the migration more than teams expect: the governance encoded in AEM editable templates and content policies. These are not just implementation details. They frequently define what authors can place on a page, how much structural freedom they have, which defaults are enforced, and where layout behavior is inherited rather than intentionally chosen.

When that governance is not audited early, Drupal target-state decisions can harden around incomplete assumptions. The result is familiar: target content models that are too rigid or too loose, layout systems that recreate the wrong constraints, component mapping that misses context, and late-stage realization that the old platform was doing more behavioral governance than anyone documented.

The practical goal is not to reproduce AEM feature-for-feature in Drupal. It is to identify which authoring rules are genuinely durable and which ones are merely artifacts of how AEM was configured over time. That distinction is what prevents a migration from importing complexity that no longer serves the organization.

## Why template governance is often underestimated in AEM migrations

Editable templates and content policies are easy to undervalue during discovery because they do not always show up in high-level inventories. A component catalog might list everything available. A page audit might show what is published. But neither automatically explains the governance logic connecting the two.

In many enterprise AEM implementations, template and policy configuration answers practical questions such as:

*   Which components are allowed in specific containers
*   Which style or presentation options are available to authors
*   Which layout assumptions are enforced by template structure
*   Which defaults are inherited across sections, brands, or page types
*   Which parts of the page are intentionally locked down versus locally editable

Those decisions matter because they influence author behavior at scale. Authors do not interact with abstract architecture. They interact with the boundaries the platform gives them.

During migration planning, teams often treat those boundaries as if they will naturally reappear through component rebuilding or content modeling. They usually do not. Without an explicit audit, the migration team can misread a highly governed authoring environment as a flexible one, or mistake historical AEM setup choices for business-critical rules.

That misunderstanding affects effort, design quality, and governance outcomes. If Drupal is designed with too much freedom, authors may lose guardrails they relied on. If it is designed to mirror every existing restriction, teams can spend large amounts of time re-creating outdated rules that only existed because of prior implementation constraints.

## What editable templates and content policies are really controlling

It helps to describe editable templates and content policies in migration terms rather than product terms.

From a migration-readiness perspective, they often control three broad things:

1.  **Page structure assumptions**
2.  **Component availability and variation**
3.  **Authoring constraints and defaults**

Page structure assumptions include where key regions exist, what is globally controlled, how much local variation is possible, and whether layout behavior is standardized across page families.

Component availability and variation include whether a given container supports only a narrow component set or a wide one, whether components expose different styles or configurations by context, and whether authors can compose freely or are expected to follow narrow page recipes.

Authoring constraints and defaults include preconfigured values, inherited behavior, optional versus required fields, and rules that reduce variation in the name of consistency, compliance, or operational efficiency.

In other words, editable templates and content policies often represent the operational contract between platform governance and content teams. They answer the question, "What kind of page-making is this organization actually permitting?"

That is why simply exporting content and mapping components is not enough. Two pages may look similar in output while being governed very differently in authoring. Those differences can directly affect Drupal architecture.

## How allowed components, responsive layout rules, and inheritance affect rebuild scope

Some of the most important migration implications appear in three areas: allowed components, responsive layout rules, and inheritance patterns.

### Allowed components

Allowed component rules define more than editor convenience. They often express intentional governance.

For example, a promotional region may allow only campaign-oriented content blocks, while an article body may allow only a smaller, editorially approved set. A broad inventory might show ten reusable components across the estate, but template-level allowances may reveal that each page type only permits a controlled subset.

That matters in Drupal because the target design may need different enforcement mechanisms depending on the context:

*   content-type-specific paragraph or component references
*   layout-builder restrictions
*   region- or section-based allowed block rules
*   editorial guidance supported by validation rather than hard technical restriction

If teams do not capture current allowance logic, they may over-generalize the target authoring model and accidentally flatten important distinctions between page types.

### Responsive layout rules

Layout flexibility in AEM can be more constrained than page output suggests. Some page families may appear visually diverse while still inheriting a narrow set of layout behaviors, spacing options, breakpoint assumptions, or container patterns.

During Drupal planning, this affects how teams think about:

*   whether layout behavior should be template-driven or author-driven
*   how many layout options are actually needed
*   where design system tokens should replace local page-by-page styling choices
*   whether responsive behavior belongs in components, layout primitives, or both

If a migration assumes that every visible layout difference deserves a first-class authoring control, Drupal can become harder to govern than the current system. If it assumes the opposite and strips away necessary flexibility, authors may lose the ability to produce valid page variants required by the business.

### Inheritance and shared policy behavior

Inheritance is especially important because it can hide scope.

A rule defined once may affect dozens or hundreds of pages. A style limitation or component restriction may appear to be a local page-type feature but may actually be inherited through broader template or policy relationships.

From a migration perspective, inheritance should trigger questions such as:

*   Is this a global governance rule, a section-level convention, or a local exception?
*   Should it become a Drupal design-system rule, a site-building rule, or an editorial policy?
*   Does this behavior need technical enforcement, or does it only need better documentation and training?

Without answering those questions, teams often underestimate rebuild scope or place the same rule in the wrong layer of the Drupal solution.

## Audit method: inventory, classify, and map authoring constraints

A useful audit does not need to become a forensic study of every low-level configuration detail. It needs to produce migration decisions.

A practical method usually has three phases: inventory, classify, and map.

### 1\. Inventory the governance surface

Start by documenting the authoring control surface associated with page creation and page editing.

This inventory should typically cover:

*   editable templates in active use
*   major page families and section variants
*   content policies or equivalent authoring rules associated with key containers or components
*   allowed component definitions by context
*   locked versus editable regions
*   layout options exposed to authors
*   inherited rules shared across multiple templates or sections
*   known local overrides and exceptions

The goal is not just to collect names. The goal is to understand where governance exists and how often it is reused.

A simple matrix works well here. For each page family or template context, capture:

*   intended use case
*   allowed components by region
*   layout choices available to authors
*   style or configuration options available to authors
*   inherited defaults
*   notable exceptions
*   observed business rationale, if known

This alone often exposes a major pattern: many rules were added for historical convenience, while only a smaller subset are truly important to preserve.

### 2\. Classify rules by purpose, not by AEM feature

Once inventoried, classify each rule according to the reason it exists.

Useful classification groups include:

*   **Brand consistency rules**: preserve visual or structural consistency
*   **Editorial workflow rules**: support content team quality and repeatability
*   **Business model rules**: enforce required page structures, disclaimers, or campaign patterns
*   **Technical safety rules**: prevent broken layouts or unsupported component combinations
*   **Legacy implementation rules**: compensate for limitations or historical design choices

This classification is critical because two restrictions that look similar in AEM may deserve very different treatment in Drupal.

For instance, a constrained component list may reflect a meaningful editorial model in one context and a workaround for past frontend fragility in another. Rebuilding both as hard constraints would be a mistake.

### 3\. Map each rule to a Drupal responsibility layer

After classification, map each rule to the most appropriate target-state layer.

Typical Drupal responsibility layers include:

*   **Content model**: fields, entity relationships, reusable content structures
*   **Component system**: reusable presentation units with explicit configuration boundaries
*   **Layout system**: section structure, region definitions, layout options, composition patterns
*   **Validation and form UX**: required fields, conditional logic, field constraints, guided authoring
*   **Governance process**: training, editorial standards, publishing conventions, review practices
*   **Design system**: tokens, approved visual variants, spacing rules, responsive behavior standards

This is where the audit becomes operational. Instead of saying, "This policy exists in AEM," the team can say, "This behavior should become a content-model constraint," or, "This one should be handled through [Drupal governance architecture](/services/drupal-governance-architecture)," or, "This should not be rebuilt technically at all."

## Which behaviors belong in Drupal content models, layout systems, or governance rules

One of the most valuable outputs of the audit is a cleaner separation of concerns.

Not every authoring rule belongs in the same architectural layer. In fact, migration problems often start when teams collapse everything into either content modeling or component rebuilding.

### Behaviors that often belong in content models

Rules should often move into Drupal content models when they define durable business structure rather than page-composition preference.

Examples include:

*   required semantic content fields
*   repeatable structured content elements with clear meaning
*   relationships between primary content and supporting content
*   fields that need consistency across channels or downstream reuse

If a rule exists because certain information must always be present or consistently shaped, it is usually stronger as a [content platform architecture](/services/content-platform-architecture) decision than as a page-template convention.

### Behaviors that often belong in layout systems

Rules often belong in the layout layer when they govern placement, composition boundaries, and approved structural variation.

Examples include:

*   which region types exist on specific page families
*   whether only certain component categories can appear in a region
*   approved section patterns for marketing, editorial, or product pages
*   constrained layout options that protect responsive integrity

These are usually not content semantics. They are composition and experience rules.

### Behaviors that often belong in governance rather than code

Some constraints should not be rebuilt as technical controls unless there is a strong reason.

Examples include:

*   conventions about preferred component usage where misuse is low risk
*   stylistic choices better handled through design standards and training
*   rare exceptions that would create disproportionate implementation overhead if hard-coded
*   historical restrictions that no longer reflect current publishing needs

Migration teams sometimes over-encode these rules because the source platform happened to encode them. That is not the same as saying they still should be encoded.

A good target state distinguishes between:

*   what must be enforced
*   what should be guided
*   what can be simplified

That distinction is often where major delivery savings appear.

## Anti-patterns: mirroring AEM one-to-one in Drupal

The riskiest response to template and policy complexity is to treat it as a blueprint that must be reconstructed exactly.

That approach usually produces one or more anti-patterns.

### Anti-pattern 1: Recreating every template distinction as a separate target-state construct

If small differences between AEM templates are reproduced literally, Drupal can end up with too many page variants, layout configurations, or narrowly scoped component rules. This increases maintenance cost and weakens editorial usability.

The better question is whether those distinctions represent true business variance or simply the accumulation of local decisions over time.

### Anti-pattern 2: Treating component allowance rules as immutable architecture

Allowed component lists may look authoritative, but they are not always strategically meaningful. Some were added to guard against fragile frontend behavior, inconsistent legacy styling, or organizational habits that no longer apply.

Porting them blindly can freeze legacy assumptions into the new platform.

### Anti-pattern 3: Converting presentation workarounds into target-state content design

If a layout or style limitation in AEM caused authors to structure content in a certain way, that workaround should not automatically become a Drupal content model. Teams should separate true content needs from source-platform presentation constraints.

### Anti-pattern 4: Ignoring governance altogether in the name of modernization

The opposite mistake is also common: dismissing existing template and policy rules as legacy clutter and replacing them with unrestricted flexibility.

That can create editorial inconsistency, increase training needs, and weaken quality control. Some organizations genuinely rely on bounded authoring to maintain brand, compliance, or publishing efficiency.

Modernization should simplify where possible, not remove all structure by default.

## Migration outputs that improve estimation and cutover readiness

A strong audit should produce tangible outputs that improve planning, design, and delivery confidence.

Useful outputs often include:

### 1\. A template-and-policy governance matrix

This maps page families, regions, allowed components, layout options, inherited rules, and exceptions in a form that architects, Drupal implementers, and content stakeholders can review together.

### 2\. A constraint classification register

This identifies which rules are:

*   mandatory to preserve
*   desirable but simplifiable
*   obsolete or source-platform-specific
*   better handled through governance rather than code

This directly improves estimation because it reduces ambiguity around what is actually in scope.

### 3\. A target-state responsibility map

This assigns each significant behavior to a Drupal layer such as content model, layout system, component system, validation, or editorial governance.

Without this map, different delivery workstreams often make conflicting assumptions.

### 4\. Exception and risk log

Not all page behaviors will fit neatly into a simplified model. Capturing outliers early helps teams decide whether to support them, redesign them, or retire them.

This is especially useful for cutover planning because exceptional patterns often become late blockers if they remain invisible.

### 5\. Authoring impact summary

Migration readiness is not only technical. Authors need to understand what is changing.

A concise authoring impact summary can describe:

*   where Drupal will preserve existing guardrails
*   where flexibility will increase or decrease
*   where page assembly patterns will change
*   which old habits were tied to AEM-specific behavior and will no longer apply

That helps avoid the common situation where a technically successful migration still feels disruptive because author expectations were never aligned.

## Practical decision criteria for migration teams

If the audit uncovers a large amount of template and policy variation, the immediate instinct may be to preserve detail until later. In practice, that often delays the decisions that matter most.

A better approach is to evaluate each rule using a small set of questions:

*   Does this rule protect content quality, brand consistency, or business validity?
*   Is it still needed, or was it introduced to work around historical implementation constraints?
*   Does it belong in structured content, layout composition, component configuration, or editorial process?
*   Does hard technical enforcement create more value than guided flexibility?
*   Would preserving this rule make Drupal easier to operate or merely more similar to AEM?

These questions help teams move from source analysis to target-state design without defaulting to one-to-one replication.

## Conclusion

AEM editable templates and content policies often contain some of the most important migration intelligence in the entire platform, precisely because they describe how page authoring is governed in practice rather than how architecture is described in theory.

Auditing them before Drupal target-state decisions harden gives teams a clearer view of what must be preserved, what can be simplified, and what should be intentionally left behind. It also helps separate durable authoring rules from AEM-specific implementation detail, which is one of the most important distinctions in any enterprise CMS migration.

For solution architects, migration leads, and platform owners, this work is not secondary discovery. It is a core readiness activity. Done well, it improves estimation, clarifies scope, reduces late surprises, and results in a Drupal authoring model that is governed for current business needs rather than rebuilt from inherited complexity. That is also the kind of up-front discipline that makes [AEM to Drupal migration services](/services/aem-to-drupal-migration) more predictable and reduces the risk of rebuilding source-platform behavior without intent, a pattern that is visible in large-scale consolidation work such as [UNCCD](/projects/unccd-united-nations-convention-to-combat-desertification).

Tags: Drupal, AEM Migration, Editable Templates, Content Governance, Enterprise CMS, Authoring Architecture

## Explore AEM Migration Governance

These articles extend the same migration lens by examining other hidden AEM behaviors that can recreate complexity in Drupal if they are not audited early. Together they cover access control, localization, personalization, workflow automation, and dependency mapping so teams can separate durable requirements from legacy platform artifacts.

[

![AEM Permission and Group Model Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Access Logic That Quietly Rebuilds Editorial Risk](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_1440,h_1080,g_auto/f_auto/q_auto/v1/blog-20221018-aem-permission-and-group-model-audit-before-drupal-migration--cover?_a=BAVMn6DY0)

### AEM Permission and Group Model Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Access Logic That Quietly Rebuilds Editorial Risk

Oct 18, 2022

](/blog/20221018-aem-permission-and-group-model-audit-before-drupal-migration)

[

![AEM Translation Project and Language Copy Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Localization Logic That Rebuilds Complexity if You Ignore It](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_1440,h_1080,g_auto/f_auto/q_auto/v1/blog-20240116-aem-translation-project-and-language-copy-audit-before-drupal-migration--cover?_a=BAVMn6DY0)

### AEM Translation Project and Language Copy Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Localization Logic That Rebuilds Complexity if You Ignore It

Jan 16, 2024

](/blog/20240116-aem-translation-project-and-language-copy-audit-before-drupal-migration)

[

![AEM Personalization and ContextHub Audits Before Drupal Migration: What to Rebuild, Replace, or Retire](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_1440,h_1080,g_auto/f_auto/q_auto/v1/blog-20230912-aem-personalization-and-contexthub-audit-before-drupal-migration--cover?_a=BAVMn6DY0)

### AEM Personalization and ContextHub Audits Before Drupal Migration: What to Rebuild, Replace, or Retire

Sep 12, 2023

](/blog/20230912-aem-personalization-and-contexthub-audit-before-drupal-migration)

[

![AEM Workflow Launcher Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Automation Layer That Quietly Recreates Legacy Complexity](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_1440,h_1080,g_auto/f_auto/q_auto/v1/blog-20260622-aem-workflow-launcher-audit-before-drupal-migration--cover?_a=BAVMn6DY0)

### AEM Workflow Launcher Audits Before Drupal Migration: The Automation Layer That Quietly Recreates Legacy Complexity

Jun 22, 2026

](/blog/20260622-aem-workflow-launcher-audit-before-drupal-migration)

[

![AEM to Drupal Migration: The Dependency Mapping Work Most Teams Underestimate](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_1440,h_1080,g_auto/f_auto/q_auto/v1/blog-20230914-aem-to-drupal-migration-dependency-mapping-before-cutover--cover?_a=BAVMn6DY0)

### AEM to Drupal Migration: The Dependency Mapping Work Most Teams Underestimate

Sep 14, 2023

](/blog/20230914-aem-to-drupal-migration-dependency-mapping-before-cutover)

## Explore Drupal Migration and Governance Services

This article is about uncovering hidden authoring rules before an AEM to Drupal move, so the most relevant next step is help with migration planning, content modeling, and governance design. These services support the target-state decisions, validation, and operating controls needed to preserve useful structure without carrying accidental complexity into Drupal.

[

### AEM to Drupal Migration Services

Content and integration migration with controlled cutover

Learn More

](/services/aem-to-drupal-migration)[

### Drupal Content Architecture

Drupal content architecture design and editorial operating design

Learn More

](/services/drupal-content-architecture)[

### Drupal Governance Architecture

Drupal editorial workflow engineering and permissions model design

Learn More

](/services/drupal-governance-architecture)[

### Drupal Platform Audit

Enterprise Drupal Technical Assessment & Drupal Health Check

Learn More

](/services/drupal-platform-audit)[

### Drupal Migration

Drupal content migration engineering for data, content, and platform change

Learn More

](/services/drupal-migration)[

### Customer Data Governance

Stewardship, standards, and CDP data policy and controls

Learn More

](/services/customer-data-governance)

## Explore Migration and Governance Case Studies

These case studies show how governance rules, content structure, and platform constraints were audited and translated into durable delivery decisions. They are especially relevant for readers planning an AEM to Drupal migration, because they demonstrate how teams handled structured content, component behavior, and controlled authoring at scale.

\[01\]

### [Copernicus Marine ServiceCopernicus Marine Service Drupal DXP case study — Marine data portal modernization](/projects/copernicus-marine-service-environmental-science-marine-data "Copernicus Marine Service")

[![Project: Copernicus Marine Service](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/w_644,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/project-copernicus--challenge--01)](/projects/copernicus-marine-service-environmental-science-marine-data "Copernicus Marine Service")

[Learn More](/projects/copernicus-marine-service-environmental-science-marine-data "Learn More: Copernicus Marine Service")

Industry: Environmental Science / Marine Data

Business Need:

The existing marine data portal relied on three unaligned WordPress installations and embedded PHP code, creating inefficiencies and risks in content management and usability.

Challenges & Solution:

*   Migrated three legacy WordPress sites and a Drupal 7 site to a unified Drupal-based platform. - Replaced risky PHP fragments with configurable Drupal components. - Improved information architecture and user experience for data exploration. - Implemented integrations: Solr search, SSO (SAML), and enhanced analytics tracking.

Outcome:

The new Drupal DXP streamlined content operations and improved accessibility, offering scientists and businesses a more efficient gateway to marine data services.

“Oleksiy (PathToProject) is demanding and responsive. Comfortable with an Agile approach and strong technical skills, I appreciate the way he challenges stories and features to clarify specifications before and during sprints. ”

Olivier RitlewskiIngénieur Logiciel chez EPAM Systems

\[02\]

### [United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)United Nations website migration to a unified Drupal DXP](/projects/unccd-united-nations-convention-to-combat-desertification "United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)")

[![Project: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/w_644,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/project-unccd--challenge--01)](/projects/unccd-united-nations-convention-to-combat-desertification "United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)")

[Learn More](/projects/unccd-united-nations-convention-to-combat-desertification "Learn More: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)")

Industry: International Organization / Environmental Policy

Business Need:

UNCCD operated four separate websites (two WordPress, two Drupal), leading to inconsistencies in design, content management, and user experience. A unified, scalable solution was needed to support a large-scale CMS migration project and improve efficiency and usability.

Challenges & Solution:

*   Migrating all sites into a single, structured Drupal-based platform (government website Drupal DXP approach). - Implementing Storybook for a design system and consistency, reducing content development costs by 30–40%. - Managing input from 27 stakeholders while maintaining backend stability. - Integrating behavioral tracking, A/B testing, and optimizing performance for strong Google Lighthouse scores. - Converting Adobe InDesign assets into a fully functional web experience.

Outcome:

The modernization effort resulted in a cohesive, user-friendly, and scalable website, improving content management efficiency and long-term digital sustainability.

“It was my pleasure working with Oleksiy (PathToProject) on a new Drupal website. He is a true full-stack developer—the ideal mix of DevOps expertise, deep front-end knowledge, and the structured thinking of a senior back-end developer. He is well-organized and never lets anything slip. Oleksiy understands what needs to be done before being asked and can manage a project independently with minimal involvement from clients, product managers, or business analysts. One of the best consultants I’ve worked with so far. ”

Andrei MelisTechnical Lead at Eau de Web

\[03\]

### [VeoliaEnterprise Drupal Multisite Modernization (Acquia Site Factory, 200+ Sites)](/projects/veolia-environmental-services-sustainability "Veolia")

[![Project: Veolia](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/w_644,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/project-veolia--challenge--01)](/projects/veolia-environmental-services-sustainability "Veolia")

[Learn More](/projects/veolia-environmental-services-sustainability "Learn More: Veolia")

Industry: Environmental Services / Sustainability

Business Need:

With Drupal 7 reaching end-of-life, Veolia needed a Drupal 7 to Drupal 10 enterprise migration for its Acquia Site Factory multisite platform—preserving region-specific content and multilingual capabilities across more than 200 sites.

Challenges & Solution:

*   Supported Acquia Site Factory multisite architecture at enterprise scale (200+ sites). - Ported the installation profile from Drupal 7 to Drupal 10 while ensuring platform stability. - Delivered advanced configuration management strategy for safe incremental rollout across released sites. - Improved page loading speed by refactoring data fetching and caching strategies.

Outcome:

The platform was modernized into a stable, scalable multisite foundation with improved performance, maintainability, and long-term upgrade readiness.

“As Dev Team Lead on my project for 10 months, Oleksiy (PathToProject) demonstrated excellent technical skills and the ability to handle complex Drupal projects. His full-stack expertise is highly valuable. ”

Laurent PoinsignonDomain Delivery Manager Web at TotalEnergies

\[04\]

### [Bayer Radiología LATAMSecure Healthcare Drupal Collaboration Platform](/projects/bayer-radiologia-latam "Bayer Radiología LATAM")

[![Project: Bayer Radiología LATAM](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/w_644,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/project-bayer--challenge--01)](/projects/bayer-radiologia-latam "Bayer Radiología LATAM")

[Learn More](/projects/bayer-radiologia-latam "Learn More: Bayer Radiología LATAM")

Industry: Healthcare / Medical Imaging

Business Need:

An advanced healthcare digital platform for LATAM was required to facilitate collaboration among radiology HCPs, distribute company knowledge, refine treatment methods, and streamline workflows. The solution needed secure medical website role-based access restrictions based on user role (HCP / non-HCP) and geographic region.

Challenges & Solution:

*   Multi-level filtering for precise content discovery. - Role-based access control to support different professional needs. - Personalized HCP offices for tailored user experiences. - A structured approach to managing diverse stakeholder expectations.

Outcome:

The platform enhanced collaboration, streamlined workflows, and empowered radiology professionals with advanced tools to gain insights and optimize patient care.

“Oleksiy (PathToProject) and I worked together on a Digital Transformation project for Bayer LATAM Radiología. Oly was the Drupal developer, and I was the business lead. His professionalism, technical expertise, and ability to deliver functional improvements were some of the key attributes he brought to the project. I also want to highlight his collaboration and flexibility—throughout the entire journey, Oleksiy exceeded my expectations. It’s great when you can partner with vendors you trust, and who go the extra mile. ”

Axel Gleizerman CopelloBuilding in the MedTech Space | Antler

“Oleksiy (PathToProject) is a great professional with solid experience in Drupal. He is reliable, hard-working, and responsive. He dealt with high organizational complexity seamlessly. He was also very positive and made teamwork easy. It was a pleasure working with him. ”

Oriol BesAI & Innovation (Discovery, Strategy, Deployment, Scouting) for Business Leaders

![Oleksiy (Oly) Kalinichenko](https://res.cloudinary.com/dywr7uhyq/image/upload/c_fill,w_200,h_200,g_center,f_avif,q_auto:good/v1/contant--oly)

### Oleksiy (Oly) Kalinichenko

#### CTO at PathToProject

[](https://www.linkedin.com/in/oleksiy-kalinichenko/ "LinkedIn: Oleksiy (Oly) Kalinichenko")

### Do you want to start a project?

Send