Skip to WARC content

Diagnostic Tool

Diagnostic Tool

Website Accessibility Readiness Check

Scan your website for accessibility, usability, and customer-journey issues that may affect user experience and conversions.

Free automated scan aligned with WCAG 2.2 AA expectations. No login or technical access required.

No login requiredYou don’t need an account to run a scan.
No contact details requiredWe don’t ask for your email or phone.
Get results quicklyWe’ll analyze your site and show you a snapshot as soon as it’s ready.

Start your accessibility scan

Enter your website URL and we’ll generate an accessibility readiness snapshot.

Enter a public website URL to generate an accessibility readiness snapshot.

  • No login required
  • No contact details required
  • Results in minutes

What we check

  • Accessibility signals
  • Forms & navigation
  • WCAG 2.2 AA checks
  • UX usability
  • Mobile interaction

Preview of your report

Example

Accessibility Score

72/100

Readiness Status

Moderate Risk

Accessibility74%
Usability68%
Mobile64%

Example readiness signals

  • Low contrast elements
  • Missing or weak form labels
  • Mobile interaction gaps

Built on real delivery experience

The accessibility readiness checks we use in client delivery — now available to you.

The Website Accessibility Readiness Check is built from the accessibility, usability, and quality signals we use in real projects. It helps you spot issues early before a redesign, campaign, or accessibility review, so your team can prioritize the next practical step with confidence.

Find and fix accessibility issues before they affect customers

The Website Accessibility Readiness Check highlights practical issues across accessibility, usability, forms, navigation, and mobile interaction. You get a prioritized snapshot of what needs attention, why it matters, and where to start.

  • Prioritized readiness snapshot
  • Practical fixes by affected area
  • Signals across forms, navigation, mobile, and usability

Readiness snapshot

Example issue priorities from an automated review.

72/100

Review recommended

Criteria

Forms

Criteria

Navigation

Criteria

Mobile

IssueSeverity

  • Form labels need review

    Add visible labels and accessible names.

    High

    Lead capture form

  • Heading order needs review

    Keep headings in a logical sequence.

    Medium

    Landing page content

  • Contrast signal needs review

    Raise color contrast on low-signal elements.

    Medium

    Primary CTA and supporting text

  • Mobile interaction needs review

    Increase tap target spacing and state clarity.

    Review

    Small-screen controls

Accessibility standards this check helps you prepare for

WARC uses WCAG-aligned readiness signals to help teams identify practical accessibility risks before manual review or formal compliance work.

Explore accessibility standards

Region options may scroll horizontally on small screens.

WCAG

Global baseline

The shared technical baseline behind many accessibility checks and regional requirements.

Read more about WCAG

EAA / EN 301 549

EU

The European Accessibility Act and EN 301 549 connect digital-product readiness with WCAG-aligned technical expectations.

Read more about EAA / EN 301 549

ADA

U.S.

U.S. accessibility obligations often use WCAG as the practical technical reference for website and application review.

Read more about ADA

AODA

Canada

Ontario requirements reference accessible digital experiences and commonly align practical review work with WCAG criteria.

Read more about AODA

DDA

Australia

Australian accessibility programs commonly use WCAG-aligned technical checks to reduce barriers before manual review.

Read more about DDA

Issue guides

Common accessibility issues this check helps surface

WARC highlights practical readiness signals such as missing alt text, low contrast, unclear links, keyboard navigation issues, and form-label problems. Use the issue guides to understand why these signals matter and how to plan remediation before manual review.

View all accessibility issue guides
Screen reader supportRead guide

Hidden elements may still receive keyboard focus

Hidden interface regions may still expose focusable controls, which can disrupt keyboard and assistive-technology navigation.

Suggested owner
Developer
Estimated effort
Medium
Link accessibilityRead guide

Some links may not be understandable to assistive technologies

Some links may not communicate clear purpose to assistive technologies, making navigation harder for users relying on spoken or non-visual output.

Suggested owner
Content editor
Estimated effort
Medium
Visual accessibilityRead guide

Some text or UI elements may be hard to read

Some text or interface elements may be hard to read because foreground and background colors do not provide enough visual contrast.

Suggested owner
Designer
Estimated effort
Medium
Image accessibilityRead guide

Some images may be missing meaningful alt text

Some informative images may be missing meaningful alternative text, which can reduce content clarity for assistive-technology users.

Suggested owner
Content editor
Estimated effort
Medium
Keyboard navigationRead guide

Keyboard users may need a faster way to reach main content

Keyboard users may need a direct path to main content instead of tabbing through repeated navigation on every page load.

Suggested owner
Developer
Estimated effort
Medium
Forms and labelsRead guide

Some visible labels may not match accessible names

Visible labels may not match accessible names, which can create confusion for users relying on voice control or assistive technologies.

Suggested owner
Developer
Estimated effort
Medium

FAQ

Clear answers about what the automated PathToProject checks cover and how to use the readiness result.

What does the scan check?

The scan runs automated PathToProject checks on a public website URL and looks for accessibility, usability, forms, navigation, mobile interaction, and WCAG 2.2 AA readiness signals.

Do I need to log in or share contact details?

No. The default scan only needs a public website URL. You do not need to log in, provide technical access, or share contact details to generate a readiness snapshot.

Does this replace a manual accessibility review?

No. The results are automated readiness signals that help identify likely issues and priorities. Manual accessibility review is still needed before final conclusions or compliance decisions.

How should I use the result?

Use the readiness snapshot to review detected issues, prioritize fixes, and plan follow-up manual accessibility review with your internal team or accessibility partner.

What happens if I provide an email on the email-optional version?

On the email-optional version, email is optional. If you provide one, PathToProject sends the completed report to that inbox after the scan is ready.